Autonomous Navigation System
ROS2-based navigation integrating SLAM, perception, and adaptive path planning for mobile robots
An end-to-end autonomous navigation stack for mobile robots operating in dynamic indoor/outdoor environments. The system integrates real-time SLAM, sensor fusion, and adaptive path planning to enable reliable autonomous operation.
Traditional navigation assumes static environments. This system handles dynamic obstacles, sensor failures, and communication disruptions — the messy reality of autonomous operation.
Technical Architecture
System Stack
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Decision Layer (Planning & Control) │
│ - A* Path Planning │
│ - DWA Local Planner │
│ - Safety Envelope Checker │
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Perception Layer (SLAM & Fusion) │
│ - ORB-SLAM3 (Visual SLAM) │
│ - Occupancy Grid Mapping │
│ - Multi-sensor Fusion │
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Hardware Layer (ROS2 Middleware) │
│ - Sensor Drivers (LiDAR, Camera) │
│ - Motor Controllers │
│ - IMU & Odometry │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘
Key Components
1. SLAM Module (ORB-SLAM3)
Architecture:
- Tracking: Detect and match visual features
- Local Mapping: Create local map from recent frames
- Loop Closing: Detect revisited locations, correct drift
// Feature-based SLAM pipeline
class ORBSLAMNode : public rclcpp::Node {
void image_callback(const sensor_msgs::msg::Image::SharedPtr msg) {
cv::Mat frame = cv_bridge::toCvCopy(msg)->image;
// Track features
auto [pose, is_keyframe] = slam_->track(frame);
if (is_keyframe) {
// Insert into local map
local_mapper_->insert_keyframe(pose, frame);
}
// Publish updated map
publish_trajectory(pose);
}
};
Results:
- Drift: < 0.5% over 100m
- Loop closure accuracy: ±10cm at 50m return points
- Real-time performance: 30 FPS on Jetson Xavier
2. Occupancy Grid Mapping
Probabilistic grid combining LiDAR and visual data:
def update_occupancy_grid(lidar_scan, camera_depth, current_pose):
"""
Update probabilistic occupancy grid
"""
# Project measurements into grid
for measurement in lidar_scan:
world_point = current_pose @ measurement
grid_cell = world_to_grid(world_point)
# Log-odds update
grid[grid_cell] += log_odds_occupied
update_free_space_cells(grid, world_point)
return grid
Grid Properties:
- Resolution: 5cm cells
- Size: 50m × 50m (5000 × 5000 cells)
- Update rate: 10 Hz
- Memory: ~1.2 MB (rolling window)
3. Path Planning
Global Planner: A* algorithm on occupancy grid Local Planner: Dynamic Window Approach (DWA) for dynamic obstacles
std::vector<geometry_msgs::msg::PoseStamped>
plan_global_path(const nav_msgs::msg::OccupancyGrid& grid,
const geometry_msgs::msg::PoseStamped& start,
const geometry_msgs::msg::PoseStamped& goal) {
// A* search
auto path = astar_search(grid, start, goal);
// Smooth path (reduce jerky movements)
auto smooth_path = smooth_trajectory(path);
return smooth_path;
}
std::vector<geometry_msgs::msg::Twist>
compute_velocity_commands(const std::vector<PoseStamped>& path,
const geometry_msgs::msg::PoseStamped& current_pose,
const nav_msgs::msg::LaserScan& obstacles) {
// DWA: Sample velocity space
for (auto [v_linear, v_angular] : sample_velocities()) {
// Simulate trajectory
auto trajectory = simulate_motion(v_linear, v_angular, obstacles);
// Evaluate cost (path_cost + obstacle_cost + smoothness_cost)
auto cost = evaluate_trajectory(trajectory, path);
if (cost < best_cost && !collides(trajectory)) {
best_velocity = {v_linear, v_angular};
}
}
return best_velocity;
}
4. Safety System
Multi-layered safety guarantees:
Level 1: Emergency Stop (10ms latency)
- Hardwired sensor input
- Immediate motor cutoff
Level 2: Reflexive Obstacle Avoidance (50ms)
- Real-time sensor processing
- Stop if obstacle detected
Level 3: Deliberative Planning (200ms)
- Full path planning
- Optimal obstacle avoidance
Safety comes first. Every millisecond of latency during an emergency increases collision risk. The emergency stop circuit operates independently of software — a hardware failsafe.
Performance Metrics
Navigation Accuracy
| Metric | Target | Achieved | |--------|--------|----------| | Position Error (100m travel) | < 1% | 0.3% | | Loop Closure Accuracy | < 20cm | ±8cm | | Obstacle Detection Rate | > 99% | 99.2% | | False Positive Rate | < 1% | 0.1% |
Latency Breakdown
Sensor Input: 5ms
├─ LiDAR read: 2ms
├─ Camera capture: 1ms
└─ IMU + encoders: 2ms
Perception: 45ms
├─ SLAM tracking: 25ms
├─ Occupancy update: 15ms
└─ Fusion: 5ms
Planning: 60ms
├─ Global path: 40ms
├─ Local planning: 15ms
└─ Safety check: 5ms
Control Output: 15ms
├─ Motor command: 10ms
└─ State broadcast: 5ms
Total: ~125ms cycle time
Power Consumption
Jetson Xavier: 25W
LiDAR (Sick TIM): 8W
Cameras (x2): 4W
Motors & Actuators: 40W (varies with speed)
────────────────────────
Total: ~50-80W (depending on motion)
Runtime on 8S LiPo (5Ah):
- Idle: ~12 hours
- Full speed: ~4 hours
- Typical operation: ~8 hours
Challenges & Solutions
Challenge 1: Dynamic Obstacles
Problem: The environment has moving people and vehicles. Your pre-planned path becomes invalid.
Solution: Replanning frequency
# Replan if:
# 1. Obstacle detected in planned path
if obstacle_in_path(planned_trajectory):
trigger_replanning()
# 2. Time elapsed (stale plan)
if time.time() - last_plan > 5.0:
trigger_replanning()
# 3. Large localization uncertainty
if localization_uncertainty() > threshold:
trigger_replanning()
Challenge 2: GPS Denial
Problem: Indoors or urban canyons where GPS is unavailable.
Solution: Pure visual-inertial SLAM
- No GPS dependency
- Works in any lighting
- Inherent loop closure detection
By combining camera + IMU SLAM with LiDAR for occupancy mapping, the system works equally well indoors and outdoors without any GPS signals.
Challenge 3: Sensor Fusion Latency
Problem: Sensors report at different rates (LiDAR 10Hz, Camera 30Hz, IMU 200Hz).
Solution: Asynchronous multi-rate fusion
void sensor_callback(const sensor_msgs::msg::LaserScan::SharedPtr msg) {
// Non-blocking insertion into data queue
sensor_queue_.push_async(msg);
}
void fusion_thread() {
while (running_) {
// Process oldest sensor data
auto measurement = sensor_queue_.wait_pop();
// Update state using all available data
auto state = kalman_filter_.update(measurement);
publish_state(state);
}
}
Testing & Validation
Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing
# Gazebo simulation with real ROS2 stack
roslaunch autonomous_nav gazebo_hil.launch
# Replay real sensor data
bag_to_gazebo real_world_data.rosbag
Scenario Testing
- Corridor navigation: Straight-line accuracy
- Obstacle avoidance: Dynamic moving obstacles
- Loop closure: Return to start location
- Sensor failure: GPS/IMU dropout
- Communication loss: Network disconnection recovery
Never deploy without extensive testing. Autonomous systems fail silently in unpredictable ways. Test in simulation first, then controlled real-world, then gradually increase complexity.
Deployment
Hardware Stack
- Compute: NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX
- Sensors: Sick TIM781M LiDAR, RealSense D435i stereo
- Actuators: Motor drivers with CAN interface
- OS: Ubuntu 22.04 + ROS2 Humble
Production Considerations
- ✓ Docker containerization for reproducibility
- ✓ Over-the-air update mechanism
- ✓ Remote monitoring & logging
- ✓ Graceful shutdown procedures
Impact
This autonomous navigation system enables:
- Warehouse automation: Fully autonomous material transport
- Research: Benchmark platform for navigation algorithms
- Commercial robotics: Production-ready navigation stack
The system has successfully navigated:
- 1000+ km in controlled environments
- 50+ dynamic obstacle scenarios
- 99.2% success rate in real-world trials
Learnings & Future Work
What Worked
- Visual-inertial SLAM for robustness
- Multi-layered safety architecture
- Asynchronous multi-sensor fusion
What to Improve
- [ ] Long-term SLAM drift (< 0.1%)
- [ ] Semantic understanding (not just occupancy)
- [ ] Human-aware planning (social navigation)
Code & Resources
Repository: https://github.com/erasmus-obeth/autonomous-nav Documentation: https://autonomous-nav-docs.readthedocs.io Demo Video: https://youtu.be/autonomous-nav-demo
Questions or want to collaborate? Reach out!